Conversation for Action

After conversation for possibilities, the conversation for action is possibly the most critical tool for coordinating action among people. A review of Campfire Conversations and Cave Drawings will provide context.

# Start at the top: Note: most of the action and uncertainty is dealt with between accept and declare complete.

digraph { layout=dot rankdir=TB overlap=false consentrate=true node [style=filled shape=box] {"Conditions\nof\nSatisfaction" [color=orange]} {"Background\nof\nUnderstanding" [color=orange]} CustomerT1 [color=purple, fontcolor=white] CustomerT2 [color=purple, fontcolor=white] CustomerT3 [color=purple, fontcolor=white] PerformerT1 [color=lightblue] PerformerT2 [color=lightblue] PerformerT3 [color=lightblue] {"Request /\n\Offer" [color=greenyellow]} Promise [color=greenyellow] Accept [color=greenyellow] "Declare Complete" [color=greenyellow] "Declare Satisfied" [color=greenyellow] Cancel [color=red] Revoke [color=red] "Declare Dissatisfied" [color=red] CustomerT1 -> { "Request /\n\Offer" Cancel} -> PerformerT1 -> {Promise Decline Counteroffer Revoke } Counteroffer -> CustomerT2 Counteroffer -> "Commit-to-Commit\n(Defer)" -> Counteroffer {"Background\nof\nUnderstanding"} -> CustomerT1 {"Conditions\nof\nSatisfaction"} -> CustomerT1 PerformerT1->"Request /\n\Offer"->CustomerT1 Promise -> CustomerT2 Decline -> CustomerT2 CustomerT2 -> { Accept Cancel} -> PerformerT2 -> { "Declare Complete" Revoke} "Declare Complete" -> CustomerT3 CustomerT3 -> { "Declare Satisfied" "Declare Dissatisfied"} "Declare Dissatisfied" -> PerformerT3 "Declare Satisfied" -> PerformerT3 Revoke -> {CustomerT2 CustomerT3} }

Technical Stuff Below

CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE

Conversation for Action, Institute for Generative Leadership, Bob Dunham